ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

1320 Words6 Pages

What if scientists decided not to find a cure for Cancer or AIDS or diabetes? Have you ever wondered why your mascara is the way it is? Have you ever questioned how they made it to stores and hospitals around the world? Scientists working on animals for testing, dates back to the early 1600s when they would cut animals open to learn how the animal and human bodies worked. Today, animal testing has evolved to using animals to test cosmetics, medicines, and other various things. One of the most common tests is the draize eye test where rabbit’s eyes are used to test multiple products until their death. While animal testing is cruel and inhumane, it has dramatically changed the medical field. Animal testing has been around for centuries, …show more content…

Back in the 1970’s and 1980’s over fifty percent of medicines tested on animals cause serious harm to humans and eventually had to be thrown out. In one case a drug for heart disease named Milrinone was tested on rats, whose hearts were chemically stopped, Milrinone improved their heart conditions quickly. When Milrinone was given to humans death rates raised over thirty percent (qtd. In McCoy). It is highly noted that animal testing is not always effective in the article “Cruelty-Free Cosmetics 101” former makeup artist turned animal activist and author Natacha Cole states, “Animal testing is an outdated practice and does not provide the most reliable results regarding the safety, performance, or possible reactions that cosmetic products or ingredients could have in a person.” When cosmetic companies and scientist who have formulated new medicine they do not think about a person who may have sensitive skin or an allergy to a certain product. They only think about the profit and if it works on an animal it must work on a human. Not only is animal testing not safe for it humans it is extremely dangerous for the animals as well. From the conditions they live in to the way they are tested. George Wright and Steve Hoagland, authors of “Animal Testing Is Cruel and Immoral Regardless of the Benefits Associate With It” report, that between fifty to a hundred million animals are killed in testing labs

Show More
Related
528 Words | 3 Pages

We need to stop makeup, cleaning products, medicine and all other chemical based products being tested on animals not only because it is horrendously cruel but there is also a huge amount of money that is wasted in the process of testing. According to most statistics, human results only agree 5-25 percent of the time which means that the process of animal testing is practically pointless as the results hardly ever benefit our knowledge of how to improve the products

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Testing a company’s product on an animal does not necessarily mean it is safe for humans because there is a vast difference between the genetic makeup of the tested animals and humans. These test results determine the effectiveness for animals, not for humans. For example, rabbits have more sensitive and thinner corneas than humans, but each year many are still tortured and blinded for eye medication tests. Other animals undergo skin tests for beauty products, which hold very little credibility because the skin and hair of an animal are very different from humans. In fact, many products on the market today caused irritation or death to an animal, but the product still made to a shelf safely for

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

When animals are used to approve of chemicals for use in cosmetic products, they endure “skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of rabbits” (hsi.org). These tests can easily be prevented by the use of alternative tests, which typically involve human cells compared to live animals. Moreover, “Approximately 100,000-200,000 animals” die per year worldwide for testing within the cosmetics industry.” (hsi.org) Despite this number counting the amount of animal tested deaths in the cosmetic industry worldwide, it is a exponential number considering over “40 countries have banned cosmetic testing on animals” (humanesociety.org).

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Although there are many benefits and advancements that come with animal testing, there are downsides to all the procedures that are performed. There are individuals that are not in favor of animal experimentation but still support the testing for medical purposes. Over the prior years, the practice of using animals for medical and cosmetic research has been severely criticised (Hajar 42). Going back to the article, “Animals and Medical Testing,” Hajar notes that those opposed to practices believe that the benefits that humans get with the procedures performed do not favor the harm to animals (Hajar 42). Even though testing on animals is useful for our well-being, the animals that are being tested on can be harmed in the process.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Leaping Toward a Cruelty-Free World Worldwide, cosmetic animal testing is still implemented. Although some parts of the world have banned testing chemicals on animals such as the European Union and New Zealand, countries such as the United States and Canada continue to consent. “The beauty industry makes people look and feel beautiful but is horrifically ugly when it comes to the treatment of animals in laboratories.” (Cole 2). Knowing the alternatives, organizations, and cruelty-free products ultimately improves the knowledge about animal testing.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

Because of the harm done to the animal subjects, this testing is opposed by animal rights activists and others, and is banned in much of the European Union. Using animal testing in the development of cosmetics may involve testing either a finished product or the individual ingredients of a finished product on animals, often rabbits, but also mice, rats, and other animals. Not all companies who provide cosmetics are using animals to test their products on. Cosmetics manufacturers who genuinely do not test on animals generally use the following for safety testing of their products: reliance on existing natural or synthetic ingredients, compounds and substances, which have already been extensively tested on animals; avoiding novel ingredients or combinations of ingredients that have not been fully tested and may not be safe; testing on human volunteers/clinical trials. This presumes that cosmetics companies are already using computer modeling and cell cultures to simulate human tissue, two techniques that have had ambiguous utility in discovering problems early.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

In recent discussions of new medicine and cosmetics, a controversial issue has been whether animals should be used for scientific testing or should not be used for testing at all. On the one hand, many argue that using animals in experiments is cruel and ineffective. From this perspective, it has been proven that animals cannot contract some of the same diseases that humans can. This causes extensive experiments that harms the animals and wastes time and money. On the other hand, however, using animals in scientific research has been beneficial to medicine for decades.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing in cosmetics should not be allowed in the world, it can cause many difficulties and is not always accurate. Animals have been used in scientific testing for thousands of years (Gale). The first vivisection was performed by Greek philosopher Alcmaeon around 450 B.C. (Gale). Other Greek scientists, including Aristotle and Erasistratus, also used live animals in their experiments (Gale).

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Many have never wondered what path a cosmetic or a drug must follow before finding its final place on a store shelf and do not realize that a great suffering may stand behind it. What is more, they unconsciously contribute to this phenomenon by buying products of a brand which makes laboratory tests on animals. If by any chance some happen to be familiar with the situation, they believe in theories that animals are treated extremely kindly, kept in clean cages and that nothing serious happens to them. Unfortunately, the real-life situation is different. Many cosmetic and drug concerns use animals to test the effectiveness of new products and to find and eliminate possible harmful effects, which may appear to a human.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

The first reason why the U.S should stop testing on animals because testing things on the animals could potentially kill them. It’s as if the animals are getting tortured. “The questions implied to the use of the Draize test, which involved dripping substances such as toluene into rabbit’s eyes, causing pain and sometimes blindness. The animals are being tested on with remedies that would kill you, even worse cause pain but barely keep you alive.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

Animal testing is a very serious issue, considering the fact that it kills one-hundred thousand to two-hundred thousand animals each year (“About”). Many companies do not believe that animal testing is a serious problem and find that there are other important issues to worry about. The FDA believes that animal tests should be replaced with other tests that do not involve the use of animals because of the harm it causes them (“Animal Testing and Cosmetics”). Animals have emotions and feelings just as humans do, even though they are not always noticeable. Although animal-tested cosmetic products are very popular and used everyday by most people, animals are being hurt and killed daily to create them, therefore they should be banned from being

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Using animals for testing beauty products just to fix your face is wrong and cruel it shouldn't be happening because they are also beings that feel. Animals also suffer from illnesses and can't survive toxics they are forced to inhale, force fed, or skin/eye contact so humans can test the beauty products. Something humans should realize is that animals also have emotions tand hey feel pain. They can forget can ignore the pain they cause animals because they care more about their own personal gain. Allowing companies to use animals for their own benefits is wrong some, humans are allowing animals to be tested on just for their own benefit..

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

I do not want animals to be harmed just so that we can be ‘sure’ of what something is going to do to humans because what happens to animals is not always what happens to humans. Testing on animals is unacceptable. • Do we need to test Cosmetics on animals?

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be re-used in subsequent experiments.” This in itself explains how drastic using animals for testing can be and the impact that they are later sustained with. Researchers and scientists believe that animal testing is essential for the development and advancement of the medical field. Pro-Test standing up for science, a worldwide recognized organization explains that animal research plays an important role in basically all medical advances in the last century.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

One of the most ruthless and lethal test is the toxicity test. Many different cosmetic companies use toxicity test on animals to see what kind of reactions are caused by the chemicals in their products. According to the document “Easy on the Eyes” mascara testing involves applying products to animal’s eyes to determine toxicity. The toxicity test is very inhumane and usually leads to blindness and death. Another horrible test related to the toxicity test is the so-called draize test.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Open Document