More handpicked essays just for you.
An eassy about bombing of Hiroshima
Justification for atomic bomb use
Justification for use of atomic bomb in ww2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.
Due to the United States winning against the Empire of Japan, we now have a chance to invade the mainland. However, because of the large number of allied deaths, we must think about the decision to invade the mainland. What would be the consequences? For starters, it would add a lot of casualties to the count. We could even lose the advantage against the Empire of Japan.
The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the effort to bring the war to a swift conclusion and prevent further loss of life. The dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: Loss of innocent lives, Alternatives availability, and psychological
On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. This, in turn, killed over 90,000 people both before and after the collision and turned 4 square miles of the city into rubble. Now, the question that comes to mind; Was dropping the bomb on Hiroshima the correct thing to do? The answer I have come up with is that it was, in fact, a good decision. It helped the war in the Pacific end quicker and decrease the number of casualties.
The estimated amount of people that died in the bombing of HIroshima is 140,000 people. In August 1941 president Truman dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan. Some say that the atomic bomb was the right thing to do and others say it is not. The atomic bomb was wrong because there were alternatives, the bomb was only made for defense, and many people were killed for unnecessary reasons.
August 15 - The news has come in that Japan has officially signed an act of unconditional surrender, bringing the six-year war to an end and bringing the impending Armageddon to a halt. While many thought that Japan would hold out until the bitter end, but with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki radically transformed the playing field. The Japanese could not withstand their stance of defiance, when, on August 6th, the first atomic bomb fell upon Hiroshima. Three days later, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki.
My strongest argument AGAINST using the atomic bomb is that it will kill thousands of innocent people. The bomb that was dropped over Hiroshima instantly killed about 80,000 civilians. Those who survived were seriously injured with burns, and more people would also die from the radiation. This was talked about on page 188, “...instantly killed almost 80,000 civilians. The nuclear blast left many more people maimed or hideously burned, while others fell victim to a new, more gradual killer – radiation poisoning.”
In Hiroshima alone around 140,000 people were killed by the end of the year because of the bombing. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. Things would have been a lot different if they didn’t drop the bombs. Historians have been arguing that the atomic bombing didn’t lead to the Japan surrendering.
The atomic bomb should be supported by the U.S. because of the following reason. Many people supported the bombing because the Japanese were given a fair warning. The supporters argument states, “Additionally, bomb supporters argue that Japanese civilians were warned in advance through millions of leaflets dropped on Japanese cities by U.S. warplanes. In the months preceding the atomic bombings, some 63 million leaflets were dropped on 35 cities target for destruction by U.S. air forces. The Japanese people generally regarded the information on these leaflets as truthful, but anyone caught in possession of one was subject to arrest by the government.
In an article published by The Atlantic Karl L. Compton gives his take on the dropping of two nuclear warheads on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While reflecting he comes to the conclusion that dropping the bombs was indeed the appropriate. I agree fully that this was the right course of action, as the Japanese had proven up to this point that they weren’t willing to back down. An alternative attack wouldn’t have been as potent, and dropping the nukes prevented greater casualty numbers. Keep in mind this wasn’t just a hasty decision made by our world leaders “Then, shortly before Hiroshima, I became attached to General MacArthur in Manila, and lived for two months with his staff.
Should Japan get bombed? Did they deserve it? Do you think revenge is the key to success? All these questions were being asked when the government was deciding to drop the bomb or not. Most say yes, this bomb should be dropped since it ended the war, but is it really worth it to kill many innocent lives?
In conclusion, the bombing of Hiroshima was a justified action taken by the United States of America. The bombing created a swift end to the war and was an introspective decision that saved the lives of countless Americans and
Triston Morton The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were two of the most controversial events of World War II. The bombings, which occurred on August 6 and August 9, 1945, respectively, were the first use of nuclear weapons in warfare. The bombings killed over 200,000 people and caused widespread destruction, leading many to question whether they were necessary to end the war.
The bombing of Hiroshima has been a battling controversy on whether or not the United States did the right thing. On August 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Then on August 9, 1945, only three days from the bombing of Hiroshima, Nagasaki was bombed by the U.S. as well. The bombing of Hiroshima has its pros and cons but overall the bombing was necessary, but the second bombing on Nagasaki was not. The bombing of Japan saved American lives and many more for the future and ended the war; however, it was unethical for the thousands of Japanese who were harmed and should have had other alternatives.
Should the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be remembered as a war crime or a necessary evil? Martin Luther said “War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity; it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families. Any scourge is preferable to it.” As the same logic as it, the atomic bomb used in war is not necessary. Evil is evil, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is just a war crime.
