ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

783 Words4 Pages

Imagine being confined to a cage. You hear your friend’s in the background crying of pain. You only get attention when a human wants to use you. You are taken away from your family. You are burned. You are beaten. You are disoriented from all the chemicals, drugs and toxins floating in your body. The humans gaze upon you in interest while you plea for the suffering to stop. If you are not killed you are thrown back into your cage. You sit and wait in fear for the next terrifying and painful procedure. This is just a glimpse of what test animals go through. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial experimentation because they are unfit to produce human results, it is incredibly expensive and testing is cruel and inhumane
First, a staggering number of 26 million animals are used for testing in the United States every year. Animals are very different from humans; therefore they are not the best test subjects. Paul Furlong, a Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states, "it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human." Moreover, new methods are being created …show more content…

Animals such as rats, mice, primates, rabbits, cats and dogs are used to run tests on. PETA declares, “Some animals have portions of their brains destroyed or removed to impair their cognitive function or cripple them. These sensitive, intelligent animals then have their bodies immobilized in restraint chairs and their heads bolted into place as they are forced to perform a variety of behavioral tasks while their brain activity is recorded.” “Jeremy Bentham, the founder of a reforming school of philosophy, stated that when deciding on a being’s rights, “The question is not ‘Can they reason?’ nor ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?’” Bentham points to the capacity for suffering as the vital characteristic that gives a being the right to equal

Show More
Related
887 Words | 4 Pages

According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing in the United States alone test over one hundred million animals a year, they’re burned crippled and abused. Some test include killing pregnant animals and testing their babies. These animals include mice, rats, primates, birds, cats, dogs, Fish, guinea pigs, and minipigs. There are alternative ways to test products that we overlook. Animal testing is inhumane and society needs to find other ways to test products.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

Testing animals has been very critical to their health and even lead to their deaths, due to the conditions they are under. Animal testing is not justified because it is cruel and inhumane, also because animals are very different from humans and therefore make poor test subjects, and lastly they do not reliably predict results in human beings. The anatomic, metabolic and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for humans. Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University, states that “It’s very hard to create an animal that equates to what we’re trying to achieve in the human.

Read More
1644 Words | 7 Pages

Animals In Labs: A Look Inside Imagine yourself being locked in a hospital for your whole life being poked and prodded and forced to inhale harmful chemicals, or take medications that have not been approved only for the benefit of someone else. While there, you are being injected with diseases that your body doesn't get naturally nor can it fight them off.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

“Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing” (www.peta.org 1). Household and cosmetic products are known mostly for testing on animals. Some companies use animal testing as a way to determine if their products are safe for human use. Companies should not test their products on animals because there are more effective methods, too many animals are harmed in the process, and it's more beneficial to the consumers and animals. Animal testings are scientific experiments or tests in which live animals are forced to face products that can cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Every year, millions of animals suffer and even die in painful tests for the research of science. Animals have been used to test a wide variety of products ranging from simple, everyday products such as detergents and soaps, to more complicated and dangerous medical treatments. Although animal testing has helped develop vaccines for diseases like polio and malaria, it’s a horrific and completely inhumane. Sentencing an animal to a life of terror and excruciating pain is cruel and unnecessary since theirs hundreds of alternative methods that can easily replace animal testing including computer models, cloned human skin cells and human volunteers. Why do we think humans are more important than hamsters or mice?

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that animal rights should not be violated by testing, but testing may be done with lab grown organs, or any government approved alternatives. Animal testing is not wrong if it is a drug for a certain animal. However, extensive research must be done first, before testing commences. I believe this because of animal cruelty laws, and because you could find ways around the issue. Also you should not have to do much biological testing in the first place, simply because of what type of research you are doing, you should have done chemical research of the human or animals targeted, and there is the alternative of organ growing.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

A surgical blade slices through their skin without anesthesia; those wounds however are not closed, but remain open for research. They are trapped in a cage for their entire life left to rot a slow and painful death (Infinitive Phrase). Once they are gone their decomposing body is tossed in the trash without a care in the world. Animal testing is defined as “... the use of living animals in scientific and medical research” (“Vivisection” 1). The first documented animal testing occurred in 450 BC, by the Greek philosopher Alcmaeon (“Animal” 1).

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

in the end it doesn't help us, animals will become extinct and where will our food source go? How would you feel if your dog or cat was taken from you and used for commercial testing? You would not feel great about it, so why do we use other animals? What's the difference? Overall, animals should not be tested on.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Just over 1 million animals are tested each year in laboratories. Religious traditions allow humans to overrule animals. For example the Bible states in Genesis 1:26 “ And God said….Let them [human beings] have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of air, and over the cattle, and over all the Earth, and over every creeping thing creepeth upon the Earth.” But the bad thing about this is that 95% of animals that are tested are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Name : Nevil Baby Thomas Madonna ID : 227239 Topic: Against animal experiments: • Experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because: o it causes suffering to animals o the benefits to human beings are not proven o any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways In the past few years, the issues about animal experimentation had been frequently discussed.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Through the years, animal testing has become bigger and bigger throughout the years. Dating as far back as the ancient Greeks and Romans to develop their knowledge of anatomy and physiology, and to further their familiarity of the animal kingdom. The only problem was back then, anesthetics have not been discovered yet, and they were doing dissections, and examinations of the nervous system, and all the structures that are in it. The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners,

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Over millions of animals are dying each year from tests done in laboratories across the U.S. Animals are getting tested on but they are harmful tests that can kill them. We could use a program or micro-dosing. Animals are getting killed from experiments, so we have to use a program or micro dosing. What is animal testing?

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Although animal testing does find side effects in their products, However the experiments can kill the animal. “ 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing”. Says the author of peta the website. This shows that these experiments are lethal and very dangerous.

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

Several alternative technologies have been suggested to replace animal testing such as MRI scanning, computer modeling, micro-dosing, and vitro testing. There are good intentions in finding other methods to replace animal testing, researchers are obligated by law to examine other methods. Yet the benefits provided from animal research cannot be duplicated. Computers in some cases have replaced animal experimentation, yet as helpful as a computer may be it has its limitations unfortunately. They are only able to provide information on what types of “phenomena” are known.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document