The Common Core Standards were developed in approximately one year with little input from school teachers… This is especially concerning to the youngest students will have the most to lose in these standards are not correctly written. Common Core Standards are meant to as
As previously mentioned, the purpose of this particular paper is to recognize some of the advantages and disadvantages that come with the implementation of the Common Core standards. Based on the successes and failures, the hope is that the Kansas State Board of Education may further improve the public school system in the future. Therefore, one of the most controversial issues with regard to the Common Core State Standards will be addressed first; the question is whether the CCSS represent merely a list of skills that must be learned at certain grades or represent a curriculum disguised as standards. Another argument made against the CCSS, which is applicable regardless of whether the CCSS are merely a set of highly-detailed standards or
A Standard SOS There is a standard SOS. A reform is needed for how the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are used to instruct and assess students in K-3rd. The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) has brought attention to Common Core as having direct and immediate impact on children in the later years of early childhood and potential impact on programs for children prior to Kindergarten (2012, p. 3). According to the Common Core State Standards Initiative, the state standards are “a clear set of shared goals and expectations for what knowledge and skills will help our students succeed,” yet it is the responsibility of local administrators to decide how it will be taught and assessed (2016). Theoretically, it raises
The government did not mandate that states adopt it, but the board of education gave millions of dollars in grants to those who adapted to it quickly (Source A). It was the complete opposite of its predecessor, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). In theory, Common Core would make transitioning schools easier for kids. It would also present a higher standard of education, that would help the American Education system keep up with competing countries. Consequently, Common Core only succeeded in making school and education that much more difficult for students.
Common Core State Standards is causing schools and teachers to be less creative in the classroom. Common Core State Standards focuses more on teaching to a test instead of teaching to learn. While there are some benefits to teaching to a test, it is not good when the only goal of learning is to take a test. Students
Is the Common Core Good or Bad for Educators and Students? The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) were designed to help students become more independent when it comes to learning and allows students to gain an understanding of different perspectives and cultures. The CCSS also allows students to shape themselves to learn more content knowledge and utilize evidence more effectively, and enables students to become more efficient when using technology and digital media (Allyn, 2014).
It is important for students to have a good learning environment if they want to work hard and succeed, this is shown by in many schools there are countless rules in place that are supported by the fact of maintaining a good learning environment for the students. The controversy of Common Core does not help with that. With the backlash to Common Core students just don’t know what to do anymore. Parents are very anti-common core getting very involved with advocating against it, like going on Facebook and sharing their thoughts on how its ruining the education of youths (McKenna). So, at home they have to deal with parents telling them how horrible and frustrating school is.
Common Core Standards hit the educational world in a quick and not always jubilant manner. It has been an ongoing process of unconvinced expectations and doubt. School districts nationwide have had their battles with the implementation of these national standards. These standards are intended to ensure that as a nation we are preparing students through a meticulous curriculum that will allow them to be able to compete with others on a national and international level academically (college and career ready standards). Just as there are many people against Common Core Standards there are also many people who totally agree that it is the best thing that has happened to education in years.
Based on rigorous content and application of knowledge through higher-order thinking skills, 5. Built upon the strengths and lessons of current state standards, and 6. Informed by other top performing countries in order to prepare all students for success in our global economy and society” Common Core is shown to us as a learning program to put us ahead, but is just succeeding at forcing all americans to have the same learning style and learn at the same pace. While Common Core is a great idea in theory, it simply does not belong in our school systems. Common Core has made a universal language for test taking and learning across the nation.
Those who are against Common Core base their arguments of several assumptions. The first is that teachers have complained more about the amount of extra training and extra administrative attention than ever before . For example, when Karen Ridder argues that Common Core affects the teacher's performance, she assumes that teachers have no idea how to teach the new Common Core curriculum which can affect their performance and the performance on their students. This is because of the 2014 survey from the Education Week Research Center she shared. It says that eight out of 10 teachers felt they needed more training on the standards.
End Common Core Common Core should be eliminated from the school systems it is destructive to the teachers, the school system, and the state government. Common Core has been a controversial topic for years ever since the No child left behind act has been obsolete. Do we keep it since its other half , the No Child left behind Act (2001), has been irrelevant for Americas education. Common Core is destructive to the teachers; teacher evaluations have become based on the student’s annual growth per year.
Some states opted out of the testing foreseeing the federal overreach and red tape. Common Core reflects the No Child Left Behind Act by George Bush that was supposed to push the school’s rigor by mandating state testing every year for federal funding;
One of the main issues with America is its educational system and Common Core is only making the situation worse. The educational system has been very lacking in comparison to other countries. The government has tried to fix this. The first time it was the No Child Left Behind Act and that failed tremendously. After the No Child Left Behind Act failed, then the Common Core standards were created to do what the No Child Left Behind Act tried to do by standardizing all of the lessons they believe the students need to learn.
In a country that is always trying to fix its education system and always failing, the United States introduced another idea, the Common Core. Common Core is a standard that details what a student in grades K-12 should know that school year. 46 states initially had accepted these standards. Common Core has been around since 2007, but has taken effect recently. Despite it being accepted by 46 states, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it would be kept by those states.
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40
